The New Science of Subjectivity, Qualia Science.

Top scientists and consciousness researchers Deepak Chopra, Menas Kafatos, and Rudolph Tanzi propose a new science of subjectivity, qualia science, to redress mechanistic theories of reality and to humanize and restore meaning to our perception of the universe.

This excerpt was published in The San Francisco Chronicle on October 15, 2012.

From Quanta to Qualia: What Nature Is Really Telling Us

Written by Deepak Chopra, MD, FACP, Menas Kafatos, Ph.D., Fletcher Jones Endowed Professor in Computational Physics, Chapman University, and Rudolph E. Tanzi, Ph.D., Joseph P. and Rose F. Kennedy Professor of Neurology at Harvard University, and Director of the Genetics and Aging Research Unit at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH).

 

What would it take to make the universe a living thing? What would it take to make it human once again, a secure home for us instead of a cold, meaningless place? What would it take to give God meaning and a future? As disconnected as these questions may seem, they are on the minds of some farseeing thinkers. And the deeper one looks, the more it appears that all three issues – a living universe, a human universe, and a universe that holds a place for God – start to merge.  If they actually do merge, nothing will ever be the same again. Not just science but everyday existence will be completely overturned. Modern society will move from the brink of collapse to a new, humane living entity, one that honors the true nature of humans.

 

There have been great physicists who were deeply religious, such as Sir Isaac Newton, or who had a religious feeling when confronting the universe, such as Albert Einstein, but God isn’t the right place to start with these huge issues. God, in fact, is a red herring. No matter who or what created the universe, it’s here now, and we have to relate to it. How?  One of the oldest ideas, which can be found in every culture, holds that Nature is a mirror.  We relate to it by seeing ourselves, but not passively. Messages are constantly going back and forth about birth and death about constant change and the bond between our life and Nature itself.  To the ancients, a natural disaster – fire, flood, or earthquake – showed that Nature was angry. If Nature was appeased, the harvest was good and the sun shone.It was unquestioned that the universe meant something, and usually it meant that a loving deity had created a special place for his children.

 

It’s astonishing how quickly a timeless worldview was utterly brought down by science. The demolition project that included Darwin, Freud, Einstein and particularly Laplace and the mathematician-physicists of the Age of Enlightenment, doesn’t need retracting. In the old version of classical physics we relate to a completely mechanistic universe devoid of purpose. In the more modern post-classical science, a universe that operates through random chance, perfectly meshed with evolution operating through random genetic mutations. The mirror has shattered. We no longer see ourselves because there’s nothing meaningful to see, no purpose, no Creator. Even more absurd in the view of science is the notion that Nature is sending us messages – from the collision of quarks to the collision of galaxies, nothing is happening “out there” to reflect human existence.

 

Quantum physics, on the other hand, opened the door to consciousness, to a participatory view of the cosmos and us: The randomness of quantum processes is coupled to the profound view that no phenomenon is a phenomenon unless an act of observation takes place. The observers, us, even our extensions of ourselves in the form of measuring devises, are all coupled to the phenomena we study. Moreover, the randomness of quantum phenomena is coupled to the ability to make choices, the very concept of free will. We make choices as observers and Nature, although appearing to be random, makes choices to respond to us. The quantum world forever broke away from the narrow, mechanistic world of Laplace: Solid physical objects became clouds of invisible energy, the certainty of cause-and-effect turned into “probability waves,” and time and space became flexible, to the point that a cubic centimeter of empty space contains enormous virtual energy while the arrow of time can turn on itself and go backward. The reliable world of the five senses was undercut by the quantum world, where nothing known to the five senses holds true. It seems totally impossible that the gap between the two worlds could ever be closed.

 

Yet it can’t remain open, either. Human life, and the evolution that led to its present form, is meaningful, not random. It is filled with purpose, intelligence, creativity, and values like love and compassion. If you start at the purely physicalist level, you can’t get there from here. No one has explained how so-called physical matter and energy acquired purpose, meaning, and all the rest; we are a species with no foundation. We can only relate to the mindless cosmos with a shrug of the shoulders.  Electrons and hydrogen atoms floating in the bleakness of outer space bear no resemblance to the electrons and hydrogen atoms in your brain. Are they the same? If yes, it would imply that all particles possess some form of sentience. If they are not, then the science on which both are based is contradictory. Their random activity somehow turned into the most orderly, intelligent, creative activity in the known universe. How?

 

Let’s say we want to take this question personally, instead of leaving it to professional mechanistically-minded scientists. Reality is an interesting topic, but it becomes a fascinating topic when it’s your personal reality. If you knew where your own intelligence came from, why you are alive, where you are going, and what the next leap in your evolution will be, everything would change for you. In their pursuit of a Theory of Everything, the holy grail of modern physics, mechanistically-minded scientists swept under the rug and even neglected a Theory of Me, an explanation for why each of us matters.  That, in a nutshell, is what’s at stake.

 

We are immensely excited by a new science that can fill the gap created by the quantum revolution, the next natural evolution of quantum science which we call qualia science.  The word quantum was plucked from the Latin dictionary to give the strange new world of subatomic physics a tag. In the same way, qualia, which is Latin for qualities,” is a tag for a world that is as far-reaching as quantum physics but pointing in the opposite direction. Quanta are “packets” of energy, an innocuous term that wound up having explosive effects. Qualia are the everyday qualities of experience – light, sound, color, shape, texture – whose explosive effects are barely hinted at.

 

You experience the world as qualia. It’s the glue that holds the five senses together. The scent of a rose is a qualia (we’ll use singular and plural as the same word), so is it velvety texture and its crimson color.   Looking at everyday experience through the perspective of the brain, psychiatrist and neural theorist Daniel Siegel reduced reality “in here” to SIFT: sensation, image, feeling, thought. No matter what’s happening to you right this minute, your brain is registering either a sensation (I’m hot, this room is stuffy, the bed sheets are soft), an image (the sunset is brilliant, I see my grandmother’s face in my mind’s eye, my keys are on the dining room table),  a feeling (I’m pretty happy, losing my job makes me worried, I love my kids), or a thought (I’m planning a vacation, I just read an interesting article, I wonder what’s for dinner).

 

Qualia are everywhere. Nothing can happen without them, which means that if you see the universe using a human brain, reality consists of qualia. If there is a reality that exists outside what we perceive, it is inconceivable, literally.  Once you subtract everything you can sense, imagine, feel, or think about, there’s nothing. Because qualia are subjective, they directly attack the objectivity of modern science. Because experience is meaningful, qualia attack the model of random, meaningless Nature. Yet even more is at stake.

 

Since the only way we know reality is through experience, qualia, not quanta, are the building blocks of Nature.
Quantum physics undercut the notion of solid physical objects while attempting to retain the physical universe. At the same time it opened the door to consciousness. It opened the possibility of the conscious universe. Qualia science takes on the next, natural step, shows how the conscious universe operates. The physical universe needs to be tossed out as a frame of reference and following quantum physics, we need bring in the active participatory role of consciousness through the operation of qualia.

 

In its most outrageous claim, qualia science declares that only subjective experience is reliable. So-called objective measurements are a disguise for the total fluidity of experience. The objective studies of the quantum “haps” are immersed in subjective moments of experience, qualia. The universe we carefully measure is merely the reflection of the human nervous system. Even a die-hard materialist (the preferred term is now “physicalist”) like Stephen Hawking, who has no doubt that the universe exists “out there” as a given, admits that science doesn’t describe reality. Science measures things and events to deliver data according to a mathematical scheme. Another physicist, Freeman Dyson, says, “Life may have succeeded against all odds in molding a universe to its purposes.”

 

There is the key: We have created a human universe. Behind the mask of a cosmic machine whose parts can be calculated and tinkered with, the universe is humanized. There is no other way it can exist, in fact, since nothing “out there” can be experienced except in our own consciousness.  We are following the trail pioneered by the British physicist David Bohm, among others, when he wrote, “In some sense man is a microcosm of the universe; therefore what man is, is a clue to the universe.”

 

The mirror of nature is back, in other words. Strangely, by dismantling the certainty of time, space, physical objects, and cause-and-effect, quantum physicists paved the way for a paradigm shift they could never have predicted.  The cosmos has meaning, as we wish to show in the next few posts.

 

(To be cont.)

Deepak Chopra, MD, FACP, is the author of, God: A Story of Revelation (Harper One).

 

Menas Kafatos, Ph.D., Fletcher Jones Endowed Professor in Computational Physics,Chapman University, co-author with Deepak Chopra of the forthcoming book, Who Made God and Other Cosmic Riddles. (Harmony)

 

Rudolph E. Tanzi, Ph.D., Joseph P. and Rose F. Kennedy Professor of Neurology at Harvard University, and Director of the Genetics and Aging Research Unit at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), co-author with Deepak Chopra of the forthcoming book, Super Brain: Unleashing the Explosive Power of Your Mind to Maximize Health, Happiness, and Spiritual Well-being. (Harmony)

One Response to The New Science of Subjectivity, Qualia Science.

  • It seems to me that anything physical is the “effect” of an “intention or “cause”. So as to examine the physical world, we are looking at it from the end and cannot, therefore, make any accurate conclusions. There is existence and this existence can think. I believe it is “eternal love” in an ever changing mode to extend its wonder and beauty. We and this “wonder” are forever together and there is nothing outside of it. We take brief form and get lost in our identity believing we are only these forms. We will soon learn we are nothing in particular yet everything possible.

    PS

    Hello Rudy…we went to high school together.  Congratulations to you for your work and say hi to Deepak because I have been reading and learning from him for many years!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>